Sunday, May 1, 2016

Versace L'Homme (1986) Review

Versace is a pretty interesting fragrance house in the designer market. I'm admittedly not a big fan of the majority of their offerings. While they smell pleasant, they don't really stand out much or do anything unique. However, oddly enough, the Versace fragrances which I found to be the most interesting and outstanding were also the ones which tend to be relegated to the bargain bins at TJ Maxx, Marshall's, Ross, or other similar discounters. I'm mainly talking about The Dreamer, Blue Jeans, and L'Homme, which was Versace's first masculine fragrance. Since I haven't had a bottle of the former two for a few years and don't remember their note breakdown or development too vividly, I can only review L'Homme.

Versace released L'Homme in 1986. As one would expect, it does indeed smell “older,” in the sense that you won't smell too many modern designer fragrances like this. At the same time, it doesn't smell like it came from any particular era. It does borrow a little from 80's powerhouses, but also has some accords which are very reminiscent of French fragrances from the 40's, 50's, and 60's. I can't think of too many fragrances which resemble Versace L'Homme beyond a few fleeting similarities, so it is also quite unique.

L'Homme starts off with a very dry and bitter lemon, mixed with petitgrain. This accord doesn't smell like a citrus fruit, but is rather more like a mix of the rinds and the citrus flowers. This is very reminiscent of classic French perfumery, such as Eau Sauvage, Moustache, Chanel pour Monsieur, or Monsieur de Givenchy. There's a green and herbaceous quality coming from the basil as well, which helps temper and sweeten what would otherwise be significantly more bitter and harsh.

The accords from the top note don't dissipate too quickly, but smoothly blend in with the heart notes. The fragrance becomes very spicy, quite powdery, and a tad sweet. Cinnamon is the most dominant player at this point, paired with a brightly spicy sandalwood and patchouli. Honey and leather also show themselves, but they don't smell dark. They provide a slightly sour, uric, and playful animalic nuance, though it mostly smells like the glove soft leather of a pair of Italian shoes. There's also a hint of florals, one of the main ones of which is supposedly rose, yet it smells like a blend of a few flowers which are difficult to identify individually.

As the heart notes transition to the base, the fragrance is given a bit of powdery sweetness from vanilla and tonka. The sweetness is tempered by cedar, which also complements the cinnamon, sandalwood, and patchouli. A tad of greenness and depth appears when some fresh, raw, unsmoked tobacco makes itself more apparent.
I don't notice any oakmoss in the drydown, even though most note breakdowns list it. Perhaps it was toned down, if not removed, during reformulations?

Although Versace L'Homme has more in common with classic French perfumery, it performs like a powerhouse from its own era. This is easily among one of the longest lasting fragrances I own. I can't even gauge its longevity, since it lasts for a while even after enduring a shower.
It's not a brash or obtrusive fragrance, since it's not all that dark or sweet. However, it still projects fairly loudly for 5 or 6 hours, and leaves behind a noticeable sillage. Even when it starts to rest closer to the skin, it never really becomes a skin scent.

If Versace is to be remembered for their fragrances, it shouldn't be for ones like Eros, pour Homme, or eau Fraiche (none of which are fragrances I dislike; I just don't think they're interesting or unique). It should be for a fragrance like L'Homme.

Friday, April 29, 2016

Review of Ungaro pour L'Homme III

Ungaro pour L'Homme III is the only one of the three fragrances in the Ungaro pour L'Homme series which is still in production, as well as the only one which I have tried. Despite having quite a following on Fragrantica and Basenotes, there aren't too many blog or vlog reviews of this one.

Ungaro pour L'Homme III is an aromatic fragrance released in 1993. Comparably to numerous fragrances from the late 80's and early 90's, it occupies a limited niche which bridges the gap between the past and future fragrances. It does not bear a lot of similarities to the aromatic powerhouses from the 70's and 80's, yet it's still really gothic and dense. It's not really like the fresh woody florals which were popular from the mid-90's through today, yet it's still really fresh, and feels like it could have been a 1990's Chanel release.

Ungaro pour L'Homme III is quite complex and well blended. It starts off with a strong orange and fresh patchouli note. The orange isn't fresh and bright, but rather dark and overripe. The patchouli focuses on the green and minty quality from that plant family, rather than the earthy or chocolaty notes. There is, of course, the famed vodka note as well. It is difficult to describe, since the vodka note is not at all comparable to the harsh ethyl smell at the opening of some inexpensive fragrances, and vodka is generally a neutral and odorless spirit anyway. Yet there it is, and it gives the impression of opening a bottle of smooth vodka. Its less than neutral booziness paired with the citrus and minty patchouli is reminiscent of a vodka based cocktail you would order at a legitimate cocktail bar.

Its floral accords start to emerge shortly after. It's a seamless transition from the top to the heart, as both phases are combined for a while. I get some jasmine (but not a fecal, indolic jasmine), geranium, and rose. The florals are sightly sweet, very dark and morose, and very masculine.
Also, I don't think this is a rose dominated fragrance. It often gets recommended for masculine roses, but it's really just a supporting player to my nose.

As the heart begins to gradually transition to the base, the earlier florals start to dissipate, and the lavender is more pronounced. The lavender and remainder of the heart notes are paired with the woody accord. I get some cedar, which is more similar to natural cedarwood oil, which is very dark and earthy, rather than the Iso E Super cedar, which is lighter and more like pencil shavings. This continues into the far drydown, which is basically lavender, musk, and a little bit of patchouli.

Longevity is excellent. This lasts 10+ hours on my skin with a couple of sprays.
Projection and sillage are moderate. It projects very heavily for about an hour or so, then starts to rest closer to the skin. After about 8 hours, it becomes a really subtle skin scent.

I also can't think of any fragrances which smell like this. It is very unique, sophisticated, sensual, and austere. At such a low price point, it is worth trying if you enjoy dark, brooding fragrances, or aromatic florals. Just don't buy this expecting it to be a rose dominated scent.

Montale Black Aoud Review

 Montale's Black Aoud is a really simple and linear fragrance. Upon initial spray, you get Montale's and Mancera's signature oud...